More Failed Autism Trials and (28 million) thoughts as to why

Two autism therapies mentioned in this blog have recently failed in their clinical trials.

The selective mGluR5 antagonist mavoglurant failed in two trials funded by Roche and Coronado Biosciences threw in the towel with its Trichuris suis ova (“TSO”) program.  TSO are parasites that are introduced to the gut to modify the immune response, they are thought to help conditions like ulcerative colitis and some autism.

"Coronado Biosciences (NASDAQ: CNDO) has decided to no longer pursue the development of its Trichuris suis ova (“TSO”) program. The Company is terminating all on-going TSO trials, including the Company’s Phase 2A clinical trial of TSO in pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder. A preliminary analysis of data from this trial failed to demonstrate any signal of activity."

The original user of TSO in autism documented his case here:-

http://autismtso.com/

It has been a long time since the father updated his site. Does he still give TSO to his son?

This adds to a growing list of very expensive failures.

The good news is that people are beginning to wonder why these, and all the previous trials, "failed".  Perhaps some were not failures, rather narrowly selective successes.  A new initiative is underway called Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials to try to develop more objective measures both for diagnosing autism in young children and for tracking changes.

"The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT) is a multicenter research study based at Yale that spans Duke University, Boston Children’s Hospital, the University of Washington/Seattle Children’s Research Institute and the University of California, Los Angeles. The aim of the consortium is to develop reliable and objective measurements of social function and communication in people with autism."

  

NIH provides $28M to study autism biomarkers via its Biomarkers Consortium

That is a lot of money.

I wish them well.

I do not think they fully realize the task facing them.  There are hundreds of “autisms” and many are dynamic, so changing over time.  Even if you find a responder to a therapy, if you tested the same person six months later he might not respond positively. 

It is highly unlikely that any single therapy can target all the symptoms in any case of autism.  So multiple therapies will be needed.

For many people, autism is a moving target, any kind of allergy, tooth issue or other inflammation could cause a false negative.

Single Gene vs Idiopathic Autism

It should be much easier to develop treatment for single gene autisms, like Fragile X, than for the idiopathic (“we have no clue what causes it”) autisms.  The above trials by Roche were in Fragile-X, where at least you know that all the subjects in the trial started with the same single gene dysfunction. 

But do they have other genetic/epigenetic dysfunctions?  Do they all have the same downstream dysfunctions? 

Fragile X is caused by a lack of the FRMP protein, perhaps the only time to correct this is very early in life.  Thereafter you have the downstream consequences, some of which overlap with ideopathic autism, some of these may well be treatable. 

 Autism Case Reports and Anecdotal Evidence

A good source of information remains published case reports.  These are documented pieces of anecdotal evidence showing what appeared to help a particular person. Here is one highlighted recently by Agnieszka, a reader of this blog.

Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as A Possible Novel Therapy for Managing Epilepsy and Autism, A Case Report and Review of Literature

The index patient is a 9 year old boy with autism spectrum disorder diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). He suffered from generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy from age 4. He had taken multiple different medications such as phenobarbital, sodium valporate, and carbamazepine with sufficient dosages and durations without favorable control of his epilepsy. According to his parents’ reports, the patient took cefixime 200mg/day to control diarrhea about 2 years ago. The seizure episodes were dramatically decreased 3 days after starting the medication while the there was no change in his anti-epileptic medication regime. The seizure episodes were controlled for about 5 months, after which the number of seizure episodes again increased. His highly educated parents administered cefixime 200mg/day to control seizure again. They reported that seizure attacks were controlled markedly after taking cefixime for three days. The patient was not febrile while the medication trials were administered. Both parents reported that they repeated this trial for several times to control the seizure episodes in the recent years. The epilepsy was controlled in all of the trials after taking cefixime for 3 to 5 days. Then, they discontinued cefixime after 7 days. They reported that there was a marked decreased in the number of seizure attacks as well as aggressive behaviors.

You cannot read too much into any one case report, other than to note how many totally unrelated interventions seem to benefit unique cases of autism.  This only goes to show that totally unrelated dysfunctions can manifest themselves as “autism”.

If you grouped all the anecdotal evidence together you would have some interesting reading.  If someone actually followed up on these anecdotes and did some additional investigation on each case we might learn very much more.

Previous Autism Clinical Trials

When I read the original clinical trials of NAC and Bumetanide in Autism, the results seemed good enough to me to warrant my own trial.

I do not see why there has not yet been a follow up of Stanford’s trial of NAC.  There was a patent (below) and then nothing.  It clearly works in many people, but most clinicians will not prescribe it until it is “evidence based”.  Those granted the patent should then go and collect some more evidence.

Compositions and methods for treating autism and autism spectrum disorder 

Bumetanide has also been patented for autism and the next stage of trials will follow, we are informed.

I will be interested to see whether the phase 3 trials are solid enough to convince mainstream clinicians to actually prescribe it.  "A diuretic for autism, come on, be serious!"

Nothing would surprise me.

Funding for Future Trials

It would be a bold person who invested any profit-seeking capital in autism trials, but they keep coming forward.  Here is another new one, OV101 from start-up Ovid.

The only reliable source is public money and philanthropy.

It looks like the US NIH (National Institutes of Health) still has deep pockets and Jim Simons keeps backing his Foundation.

mGLuR5

Roche may not have succeeded with their mGLuR5 drug, mavoglurant, but mGluR5 remains a target for treating schizophrenia and autism

Salk team spotlights a new mGluR5 target for schizophrenia, autism

Receptors in brain linked to schizophrenia, autism

Disruption of mGluR5 in parvalbumin-positive interneurons induces corefeatures of neurodevelopmental disorders

What would a successful Autism Trial look like?

Given the heterogeneous nature of autism, even a really effective drug might not look so good in the data.  Very specific drugs that counter the disorders where there can be both hypo and hyper, will come out with some good responders, some with no effect and a sizable number with a bad effect; so on average not so good.

Drugs that affect the most common down stream effect, oxidative stress, would come out best.  So I the results Hardan obtained in his Stanford trial of NAC will be as good as it gets.  Those results were enough for me, but not so impressive to many.

Now reconsider a long forgotten trial of an anti-depressant drug, developed from a first generation antihistamine.

This trial has a rather eclectic mix of 26 subjects, but 36% were responders, either much improved or very much improved in a wide variety of symptoms including aggression, self-injury, irritability, hyperactivity, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. However the authors judge the trial drug as: 

  "Mirtazapine was well tolerated but showed only modest effectiveness for treating the associated symptoms of autistic disorder" 

What were they hoping for ?

A naturalistic open-label study of mirtazapine in autistic and other pervasive developmental disorders.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to conduct a naturalistic, open-label examination of the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine (a medication with both serotonergic and noradrenergic properties) in the treatment of associated symptoms of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs).

METHODS:

Twenty-six subjects (5 females, 21 males; ages 3.8 to 23.5 years; mean age 10.1 +/- 4.8 years) with PDDs (20 with autistic disorder, 1 with Asperger's disorder, 1 with Rett's disorder, and 4 with PDDs not otherwise specified were treated with open-label mirtazapine (dose range, 7.5-45 mg daily; mean 30.3 +/- 12.6 mg daily). Twenty had comorbid mental retardation, and 17 were taking concomitant psychotropic medications. At endpoint, subjects' primary caregivers were interviewed using the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, and a side-effect checklist.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five of 26 subjects completed at least 4 weeks of treatment (mean 150 +/- 103 days). Nine of 26 subjects (34.6%) were judged responders ("much improved" or "very much improved" on the CGI) based on improvement in a variety of symptoms including aggression, self-injury, irritability, hyperactivity, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Mirtazapine did not improve core symptoms of social or communication impairment. Adverse effects were minimal and included increased appetite, irritability, and transient sedation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Mirtazapine was well tolerated but showed only modest effectiveness for treating the associated symptoms of autistic disorder and other PDDs.

I think that was a successful trial that should have been followed up, rather then being forgotten.

Tuning GABAa receptors, plus Oxytocin

Today’s post will hopefully not get too complicated.

As has been mentioned in this blog, and also at leading institutions like MIT, it does seem possible to fine-tune certain receptors in the brain that have become dysfunctional in autism.  In the case of MIT they were “tuning” a receptor called mGluR5, which they suggested was either hypo or hyper, in other words too much or too little, depending on what the underlying disease variant was.

This was done with something called an allosteric modulator, either a positive one called PAM, or a negative one called NAM.

They found that a particular glumate receptor, called mGluR5, was dysfunction in many autism-like conditions.  But the nature of the dysfunction varied, so different people would require different treatments to return the receptor performance back to normal (top dead center).   So it really becomes like tuning your car engine. 

As I have progressed in my review of the literature it becomes clear that numerous receptors are “out of tune”; so a better analogy is tuning something like a piano.

  

Ketamine, Memantine, D-Cycloserin, Magnesium, Fenobam and yet more as Glutamatergic Modulators in Autism (and Fragile X)

"Tuning" the shape (but not number) of dendritic spines also appears not to be as fanciful as it sounds.

Back to GABA_A

Regular readers will know that one of the key dysfunctional receptors in autism is called GABA_A.

GABA A Receptors in Autism – How and Why to Modulate Them

This subject is very complicated.  In effect what appears to have happened in autism is that the neurons have not matured as they should, and so GABA_A receptors continue to function in their “normal” immature state.  The concentration of chloride remains high since the NKCC1 transporter continues to exist, whereas KCC2/3 should have developed.  The result is that when the receptor is stimulated, instead of causing an inhibitory/calming effect it causes an excitatory effect.

This is fortunately treatable by inhibiting the flow of chloride into the cells, through NKCC1, using a drug called Bumetanide.

However this is not the end of the story.

At least 11 binding sites on GABA_A receptors

As you can learn from Wikipedia:-

The active site of the GABA_A receptor is the binding site for GABA and several drugs such as muscimol, gaboxadol, and bicuculline. The protein also contains a number of different allosteric binding sites which modulate the activity of the receptor indirectly. These allosteric sites are the targets of various other drugs, including the benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepines, barbiturates, ethanol, neuroactive steroids, inhaled anaesthetics, and picrotoxin, among others.

We are particularly interested in the allosteric binding sites.

The only one that is usually referred to, in any depth, is the site for benzodiazepines, but there are at least 11 different binding sites.

GABAa receptor pharmacology.

Abstract

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)a receptors for the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA are likely to be found on most, if not all, neurons in the brain and spinal cord. They appear to be the most complicated of the superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels in terms of the large number of receptor subtypes and also the variety of ligands that interact with specific sites on the receptors. There appear to be at least 11 distinct sites on GABAA receptors for these ligands.

Development of Subtype-Selective GABAA Receptor Compounds for the Treatment of Anxiety, Sleep Disorders and Epilepsy

These sites include:-

·        GABA Binding Site

·        Benzodiazepine Binding Site

·        Neurosteroid Binding Site

·        Convulsant Binding Site

·        Barbiturate Binding Site

·        b Subunit Binding Site(s)

In an earlier post I highlighted the discovery by Professor Catterall, that tiny doses of a particular Benzodiazepine drug called Clonazepam had a strange effect on the GABA_A receptor.

Clonazepam is a known Positive Allosteric Modulator (PAM) of the GABA_A site.  In mature neurons it amplifies the calming effect when the GABA binding site is stimulated.  In mouse models of autism (we assume therefore immature neurons)   where GABA is still excitatory, the tiny dose seemed to switch it to inhibitory.

This suggests a new function, rather than a PAM, the effect was to invert the function entirely.

Now it appears that similar things may indeed also be possible at some of the other 9+ binding sites (I exclude GABA Binding Site itself)

As complicated as this subject may sound, it actually gets even more complicated since the GABA receptors are made up of sub-units.  It appears that mutations in these subunits may be a cause of some epilepsies and, I propose, some “oddities” in autism.

Recent studies have again shown that many genetic dysfunctions found in autism relate to GABA, this short article is not so recent, but gives a nice summary:-

GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. It essentially acts as a brake for brain activation. Several aspects of GABA regulation have been linked to ASD, from early brain development to adult brain function.

Variations in GABA receptor subunits have been strongly associated with ASD. GABA receptors come in two major forms: fast, “ionotropic” GABAA receptors let negatively charged chloride ions flow into the neuron, and slow, “metabotropic” GABAB receptors produce chemical messages inside the neuron. GABAA receptors, the most common form in the brain, contain five subunits that shape their properties. Genome-wide association studies have linked the GABAA receptor subunit genes GABRA4 (α4 subunit), GABRB1 (β1 subunit), and GABRB3 (β3 subunit) to autism.[1][2] In addition, deletion of a chromosomal region that contains a cluster of a variety of GABA receptor genes (region 15q11-13) causes Angelman Syndrome.[3][4]

Genes controlling the development of GABA-releasing neurons have also been associated with ASD. Autism-linked variations in the ARX and DLX family of transcription factors interfere with proper expression of GABA.[5][6][7] Absence of such GABA-releasing neurons would negatively affect early brain development as well as adult brain stability.

Notably, variations in other ASD-linked genes affect GABA signaling. New evidence shows that the gene MECP2, the mutation of which causes Rett Syndrome, is critical for normal function of GABA-releasing neurons.[8] When MECP2 expression was blocked in GABAergic neurons of mice, GABA expression and release were reduced and the mice exhibited autistic behaviors.

ASD is a complex disorder that is likely to be caused by a combination of mutations in a variety of genes. GABA receptors are a promising therapeutic target because of their important role in monitoring brain excitation. Identification and exploration of autism-linked mutations in other GABA-related genes could shed light on the pathogenesis of autism.

Over to Switzerland

At the University of Bern a small research group is looking  at the world of  GABA_A receptors, here is what they say:-

“Many scientists and companies are put off by the complexity of the field of GABA_A receptors, but it is exactly this complexity that offers numerous possibilities of fine-tuned pharmacological interventions.” 

Prof.Dr. Erwin Sigel

Here is one of their recent papers, that shows both what is known and how very much remains unknown.

Structure, Function, and Modulation of GABAA Receptors

Ion Conductance

The GABA_A receptors are generally GABA-gated anion channels selective for Cl⁻ ions, with some permeability for bicarbonate anions (49). Exceptionally, in C. elegans, a cation-selective GABA-gated channel has been discovered (50). Excitatory neurotransmitters increase the cation conductance to depolarize the membrane, whereas inhibitory neurotransmitters increase the anion conductance to tendentially hyperpolarize the membrane. However, if the gradient for Cl⁻ ions decreases due to down-regulation of KCC2 chloride ion transporters, opening of GABA_A receptors may cause an outward flux of these anions, leading to depolarization of the membrane and thereby to excitation. This phenomenon has been implicated in neuropathic pain (51). During early development (52) and in neuronal subcompartments (53), GABA similarly confers excitation. 

Although it is relatively simple to address questions at the level of individual receptor subunit isoforms, we can only speculate how many GABA_A receptors are expressed in our brain and what their subunit composition is, not to mention subunit arrangement.

Conclusions

Many scientists and companies are put off by the complexity of the field of GABA_A receptors, but it is exactly this complexity that offers numerous possibilities of fine-tuned pharmacological interventions.

It may be anticipated that genetic alterations of subunits of the GABA_A receptor affect any of the above mentioned processes and thereby contribute to inherited human diseases. A start has been made with the analysis of point mutations that cause epilepsy

Mutations in GABAA receptor subunits associated with genetic epilepsies

Why is all this relevant ?

We have in recent posts discovered that at least two anti-convulsants (carbamazepine and phenytoin) appear to modulate GABAA receptors in unexpected ways when given in tiny doses.

We also found out that valproate also seems to possess such qualities.  The exact mode of action of valproate is not known and perhaps it also acts a modulator of one of the many binding sites on the GABAA receptors.

We do think that valproate is working somehow via GABA.

Modulation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor by the antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine and phenytoin

It turns out that Carbamazepine has also been shown to potentiate GABA receptors made up of alpha1, beta2, and gamma2 subunits.

I have already established that the effect of tiny doses of Valproate is not the same as tiny doses of Clonazepam.

The next step would be to look at the effect of tiny doses of carbamazepine, phenytoin and potentially anything else that modulates those mysterious  GABA_Asites.  They are clearly all there for a reason.  It seems that their role goes beyond just the allosteric modulation (amplification/reduction) of GABA’s effect.  It is likely much more subtle and they affect emotional behaviour.

Given the difficulty/impossibility of research on human brains, in the end we may need to revert to the medical world’s often used “scientific” discovery methods known as trial and error, and stumbled upon.

For the moment that will be left to Professors Sigel and Catterall and their mice, and Dr Bird, in Australia, with his human subjects.

Oxytocin and Bumetanide share the same mode of action in autism

Whilst on the subject of GABA_A, I should come back to Oxytocin.

Oxytocin-Mediated GABA Inhibition During Delivery Attenuates Autism Pathogenesis in Rodent Offspring

The conclusion of this Ben-Ari paper from last year is that Oxytocin and Bumetanide share the same effect in autism; they lower the level of chloride within the neurons and help switch GABA back to inhibitory.

It seems that oxytocin from the mother may be the signal to the developing brain to lower Cl levels.  Oxytocin has many other functions in the body.

Small doses of oxytocin/Syntocinon, have been shown to be effective in some people with autism.  One reader from Portugal has written on this blog how effective it has been in his young son.

Oxytocin/Syntocinon is not available everywhere, but is being reintroduced to the US.

Retrophinto reintroduce Syntocinon™ Nasal Spray in the U.S. and Develop the Drug for Schizophrenia and Autism

I am wondering if in some people, who are not responders, bumetanide/oxytocin lowers the level of chloride, but not enough to show any benefit.  People using Bumetanide, which has a short half-life, comment that the effect fades through the day and that splitting the same daily dose 3 times a day is beneficial over 2 times a day.  This might suggest that combining Oxytocin with Bumetanide might give better results, by maintaining the downward pressure on chloride levels and keeping GABA more inhibitory and for longer.

In the longer term, an analog of Bumetanide is needed without the diuretic effect and with a delayed release, to maintain a constant effective level.  This is known to the researchers, but would require a big financial investment.

Larger doses of oxytocin are likely to produce effects elsewhere in the body.

If anyone tries the combination of Bumetanide + oxytocin, let me know.

Tuning Wnt Signaling for more/fewer hairs and to optimize Dendritic Spine Morphology in Autism

Today’s post is about another example of how evolution can play jokes on us.  It really is the case that a signaling pathway that controls hair growth is the same that determines the number and shape of dendritic spines in the brain.

This is good news not just for Homer Simpson but for people interesting in perking up behavior and cognitive function in autism.

The post also connects several subjects that we have previously encountered - dendritic spines which are abnormal in autism, Wnt signaling which is implicated in cancer (and autism), statins, Ivermectin, CAPE found in some propolis and verapamil.  There is plenty of research to back all these connections, but strangely nobody seems to be applying them to develop any practical therapies.

I introduced dendritic spines in an earlier post.  Each neuron in your brain has hundreds of protruding spines.

Dendritic Spines in Autism – Why, and potentially how, to modify them

In that post I reported that PAK1, the gene NrCAM and the protein MTOR were all implicated in the dysfunction in both shape and number of these spines.

It now seems that there may be one even more critical pathway involved – Wnt. There are links between Wnt and PAK1, that appeared in several earlier posts.

You may recall that dendritic spines are constantly changing shape.  Their shape affects their function.  In many disorders, both the number and shape of the spines is dysfunctional.  It appears that the morphology (shape) can be modified, which implies you could affect behavior, memory, and cognitive function.

My follow up post of dendritic spines has yet to materialize, but here is a sneak preview, showing the progression of autism, schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s in terms of the number of dendritic spines.

Dendritic Spines and Wnt Signaling

Dendritic spines are constantly changing their shape and certain psychiatric disorders are characterized by different morphologies (shapes) of these spines.  It is not just the number of spines, but their shape which affects cognitive function, memory and behavior.

The Wnt signaling pathway also lies behind hair growth.

What is more, we know that Wnt signaling is dysfunctional in autism and we even now which the genes are that likely trigger of this dysfunction.

Wnt dysfunction is also involved in many types of cancer and therefore has been subject of much research.

The surprise came when I read that attempts are underway to “tune” Wnt signaling to control hair growth.  Why not autism?

This post is about tuning Wnt signaling to improve cognitive function and behavior.  This appears just as plausible as controlling hair growth.

The Wnt Signaling Pathways

Here is the Wikipedia explanation.

Wnt signaling pathway

The Wnt signaling pathways are a group of signal transduction pathways made of proteins that pass signals from outside of a cell through cell surface receptors to the inside of the cell. Three Wnt signaling pathways have been characterized: the canonical Wnt pathway, the noncanonical planar cell polarity pathway, and the noncanonical Wnt/calcium pathway. All three Wnt signaling pathways are activated by the binding of a Wnt-protein ligand to a Frizzled family receptor, which passes the biological signal to the protein Dishevelled inside the cell. The canonical Wnt pathway leads to regulation of gene transcription, the noncanonical planar cell polarity pathway regulates the cytoskeleton that is responsible for the shape of the cell, and the noncanonical Wnt/calcium pathway regulates calcium inside the cell. Wnt signaling pathways use either nearby cell-cell communication (paracrine) or same-cell communication (autocrine). They are highly evolutionarily conserved, which means they are similar across many species from fruit flies to humans.^[1][2]
Wnt signaling was first identified for its role in carcinogenesis, but has since been recognized for its function in embryonic development. The embryonic processes it controls include body axis patterning, cell fate specification, cell proliferation, and cell migration. These processes are necessary for proper formation of important tissues including bone, heart, and muscle. Its role in embryonic development was discovered when genetic mutations in proteins in the Wnt pathway produced abnormal fruit fly embryos. Later research found that the genes responsible for these abnormalities also influenced breast cancer development in mice.
The clinical importance of this pathway has been demonstrated by mutations that lead to a variety of diseases, including breast and prostate cancer, glioblastoma, type II diabetes, and others.^[3][4]

The Canonical Wnt pathway is dysfunctional in Autism

It is the canonical Wnt pathway that is dysfunction in autism and it is this same pathway plays a role in dendrite growth and suboptimal Wnt activity negatively affects the dendritic arbor.

A very thorough review of all the genetic evidence is provided in the following study:

A review of the evidence for the canonical Wnt pathway in autism spectrum disorders

Notably, the available genetic information indicates that not only canonical Wnt pathway activation, but also inhibition seems to increase autism risk. The canonical Wnt pathway plays a role in dendrite growth and suboptimal activity negatively affects the dendritic arbor. In principle, this provides a logical explanation as to why both hypo- and hyperactivity may generate a similar set of behavioral and cognitive symptoms.

The review highlights that, as we have seen before, some people with autism are hypo and some people are hyper; this means some people need Wnt signaling to be inhibited and other people need the opposite therapy.  The author points out that you really need some test to check which way you need your Wnt “tuned”.  

It sounds a bit like tuning the timing of the sparks inside your car engine, in the days before it was all electronic and self-tuning.  In theory you needed to measure the timing of the sparks with a special strobe light; but if you knew what you were doing you could just use your ears.  So in the same vein, you could make a small change to inhibit Wnt and see the result, if it made matters worse you just stop and go the other way.  As you will see later in this post, some of us are already tuning Wnt without even realizing it.

We have exactly the same issue with mGluR5, where you might need a positive/negative allosteric modulator to optimize brain performance.  Different variants of “autism” would be located either left or right of “top dead center”.

In that post we learnt that at MIT they are suggesting that errors in synaptic protein synthesis are behind several types of autism and that these errors can be corrected using either positive or negative stimulators of the receptor mGluR5.

Ketamine, Memantine, D-Cycloserin, Magnesium, Fenobam and yet more as Glutamatergic Modulators in Autism (and Fragile X)

For a more detailed understanding of Wnt signaling, see the paper below:-

Wnt signal transduction pathways

For Homer Simpson and others wanting more hair

Tuning Wnt signals for more or fewer hairs

Abnormal hair development and regeneration has been implicated in diseases of the skin (ie., hirsutism, alopecia, etc) or in open wounds when hair follicles are completely eliminated. To manage these clinical conditions, it is important to understand molecular pathways which regulate the number, size, growth and regeneration of hair follicles. Wnt signaling plays a fundamental role in this process. We need a deeper understanding so we can reliably adjust Wnt levels in existing follicles. This studies reviewed here have future translational value for skin regeneration following severe wound injuries or in the context of tissue engineering. Tuning the levels of Wnt ligands can directly modulate the number and growth of hairs. Using this new knowledge, we now know that Wnt activity can be modulated by adjusting the secretion of Wnt ligands, altering binding of ligands to receptors, inhibiting β-catenin translocation, or by regulating extra-follicular dermal Wnt and Wnt inhibitors.

How to tune Dendritic Spine Morphology

We have already encounter Brain-Derived Neurotropic Factor  (BDNF) in an earlier post.  You could think of BDNF as brain fertilizer.

Human Growth Factors, Autism and the Centenarian Nobel Laureate

“Older people and anyone with Retts Syndrome are likely to benefit from more NGF (Nerve Growth Factor).  In autism it appears possible that there was too much NGF and BDNF at a very early age, with levels then changing.  High levels of NGF and BDNF look a bad idea.  A lot more research is needed to understand what determines  NGF and BDNF levels.  It appears that BDNF may stay high in autism, but NGF levels.”

It has been shown that BDNF and Wnt signaling together regulate dendritic spine formation.

So, since in autism we have excess BDNF as the brain is developing, this might explain there are too many dendritic spines in autistic brains.  Too many spines and the wrong morphology (shape) would explain very many issues that have gone “wrong” in autistic brains.

Neurotrophin and Wnt signaling cooperatively regulate dendritic spine formation

Here, we show that Wnt signaling inhibition in cultured cortical neurons disrupts dendritic spine development, reduces dendritic arbor size and complexity, and blocks BDNF-induced dendritic spine formation and maturation. Additionally, we show that BDNF regulates expression of Wnt2, and that Wnt2 is sufficient to promote cortical dendrite growth and dendritic spine formation. Together, these data suggest that BDNF and Wnt signaling cooperatively regulate dendritic spine formation.

BDNF overexpression rapidly and robustly increases primary dendrite formation in cortical neurons (Horch et al., 1999; McAllister et al., 1997; Wirth et al., 2003). We reproduced this finding, and found that this increase was not blocked by overexpression of the Wnt inhibitors (Fig. S2), indicating that some aspects of BDNF modulation of dendrites remain intact in the presence of Wnt inhibitors. To further assess whether expression of the Wnt inhibitors impaired the signaling ability of BDNF, we analyzed autocrine induction of c-Fos expression by BDNF overexpression. c-Fos is an immediate early gene whose transcription is rapidly upregulated by BDNF (Calella et al., 2007; Gaiddon et al., 1996). We found that BDNF induced c-Fos expression was not reduced in neurons overexpressing any of the four Wnt inhibitors, suggesting that the ability of the inhibitors to interfere with BDNF-induced spine formation and spine head width expansion was not a result of decreased levels of BDNF signaling (Fig. S3).

Fig. 5

Wnt2 overexpression is sufficient to increase cortical dendrite length. (A) Representative cortical neurons expressing either EV or Wnt2. Quantification of the total dendrite length per neuron (B) and the number of dendritic endpoints per neuron (C) for ...

Fig. 6

Wnt2 overexpression increases dendritic protrusion density and influences spine shape on cortical neurons. (A) Representative dendritic segments of cortical neurons expressing either EV or Wnt2. (B) Quantification of dendritic protrusion density. (C) ...

Wnt inhibition and dendritic spine maturation

We found that a series of different Wnt signaling inhibitors were able to block BDNF-induced increases in dendritic spine density and dendritic spine head width

I think all this existing science really tells us a lot.

Back in the slow lane

In cancer research, decades have already been spent investigating Wnt signaling.

Wnt Signaling Inhibition: Will Decades of Effort Be Fruitful at Last?

Drugs that Enhance Wnt Signaling

Back in my world, with a little help from Google scholar, I rapidly find that drugs already exist that affect Wnt signaling.  Some very familiar names pop up.

Simvastatin Promotes Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis by Enhancing Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling

SummaryStatins improve recovery from traumatic brain injury and show promise in preventing Alzheimer disease. However, the mechanisms by which statins may be therapeutic for neurological conditions are not fully understood. In this study, we present the initial evidence that oral administration of simvastatin in mice enhances Wnt signaling in vivo. Concomitantly, simvastatin enhances neurogenesis in cultured adult neural progenitor cells as well as in the dentate gyrus of adult mice. Finally, we find that statins enhance Wnt signaling through regulation of isoprenoid synthesis and not through cholesterol. These findings provide direct evidence that Wnt signaling is enhanced in vivo by simvastatin and that this elevation of Wnt signaling is required for the neurogenic effects of simvastatin. Collectively, these data add to the growing body of evidence that statins may have therapeutic value for treating certain neurological disorders.Simvastatin rescues cerebrovascular and memory-related deficits in mouse models of Alzheimer disease (AD) (Li et al., 2006; Tong et al., 2009, 2012), and recent meta-analysis of clinical studies concluded that statins provide a slight benefit in the prevention of AD and all-type dementia (Wong et al., 2013). While these effects have been attributed to reduction of inflammation, reduced oxidative stress, upregulated PI3K/AKT signaling, and enhanced neurogenesis, the mechanisms by which statins are beneficial in neurological disorders are not fully understood.Simva is under investigation for its potential therapeutic effects outside of hyperlipidemia treatment. While statins have been reported to enhance Wnt signaling in vitro, it was heretofore not known whether statins can enhance this pathway in vivo and in the context of neurogenesis. Here we provide evidence that oral simva treatment enhances Wnt signaling in the mammalian adult hippocampus. This is significant in that aside from lithium, no other clinically approved compound has been demonstrated to enhance Wnt signaling in the brain

You will find the element Lithium in your smart phone battery, but it is also a drug.

Lithium is useful in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Lithium salts may also be helpful for related diagnoses, such as schizoaffective disorder and cyclic major depression. The active part of these salts is the lithium ion Li⁺.

But, not surprisingly, Lithium has other effects, like activating Wnt signaling.

Lithium activates the Wnt and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Akt signaling pathways to promote cell survival in the absence of soluble survival factors.

Drugs that inhibit Wnt Signaling

There are drugs with the opposite effect, inhibiting Wnt signaling.

Verapamil Protects against Cartilage Degradation in Osteoarthritis by Inhibiting Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling

Abstract

In past years, the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway has emerged as a critical regulator of cartilage development and homeostasis. FRZB, a soluble antagonist of Wnt signaling, has been studied in osteoarthritis (OA) animal models and OA patients as a modulator of Wnt signaling. We screened for FDA-approved drugs that induce FRZB expression and suppress Wnt/β-catenin signaling. We found that verapamil, a widely prescribed L-type calcium channel blocker, elevated FRZB expression and suppressed Wnt/β-catenin signaling in human OA chondrocytes. Expression and nuclear translocation of β-catenin was attenuated by verapamil in OA chondrocytes. Lack of the verapamil effects in LiCl-treated and FRZB-downregulated OA chondrocytes also suggested that verpamil suppressed Wnt signaling by inducing FRZB. Verapamil enhanced gene expressions of chondrogenic markers of ACAN encoding aggrecan, COL2A1 encoding collagen type II α1, and SOX9, and suppressed Wnt-responsive AXIN2 and MMP3 in human OA chondrocytes. Verapamil ameliorated Wnt3A-induced proteoglycan loss in chondrogenically differentiated ATDC5 cells. Verapamil inhibited hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes in the explant culture of mouse tibiae. Intraarticular injection of verapamil inhibited OA progression as well as nuclear localizations of β-catenin in a rat OA model. We propose that verapamil holds promise as a potent therapeutic agent for OA by upregulating FRZB and subsequently downregulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Repositioning verapamil—for Wnt of an OA treatment

The river blindness drug Ivermectin and related macrocyclic lactones inhibit WNT-TCF pathway responses in human cancer

AbstractConstitutive activation of canonical WNT-TCF signaling is implicated in multiple diseases, including intestine and lung cancers, but there are no WNT-TCF antagonists in clinical use. We have performed a repositioning screen for WNT-TCF response blockers aiming to recapitulate the genetic blockade afforded by dominant-negative TCF. We report that Ivermectin inhibits the expression of WNT-TCF targets, mimicking dnTCF, and that its low concentration effects are rescued by direct activation by TCF^VP16. Ivermectin inhibits the proliferation and increases apoptosis of various human cancer types. It represses the levels of C-terminal β-CATENIN phosphoforms and of CYCLIN D1 in an okadaic acid-sensitive manner, indicating its action involves protein phosphatases. In vivo, Ivermectin selectively inhibits TCF-dependent, but not TCF-independent, xenograft growth without obvious side effects. Analysis of single semi-synthetic derivatives highlights Selamectin, urging its clinical testing and the exploration of the macrocyclic lactone chemical space. Given that Ivermectin is a safe anti-parasitic agent used by > 200 million people against river blindness, our results suggest its additional use as a therapeutic WNT-TCF pathway response blocker to treat WNT-TCF-dependent diseases including multiple cancers.

Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester in Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway on Human Neuroglioma

Previous studies have revealed that its anti-tumor function could be attributed to its ability to suppress the abnormal Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

What about hair loss/gain?

To quote from  the previous study on hair loss gain:-

“Using this new knowledge, we now know that Wnt activity can be modulated by adjusting the secretion of Wnt ligands, altering binding of ligands to receptors, inhibiting β-catenin translocation, or by regulating extra-follicular dermal Wnt and Wnt inhibitors.”

We have now learnt that the drug Verapamil is thought to be a Wnt inhibitor.  So it would be fair to assume that hair loss would be reported as a side effect of using Verapamil.  Indeed it is.

Dermatologic

Dermatologic side effects have included rash (up to 1.4%). Diaphoresis has been reported with intravenous verapamil. Arthralgia and rash, exanthema, hair loss, hyperkeratosis, macules, sweating, urticaria, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and erythema multiforme have been reported during open trials/postmarketing experience.

What about Statins and hair?

So many millions of people take statins, of course somebody would claim it causes hair loss (alopecia).  I think it should cause hair gain.  As with Verapamil the effect on the hair growth would be much greater if it was applied to the skin and not taken orally.  Maybe older people would not go to the doctor to complain about hair gain?

Do statins cause alopecia?

Summary

·        As hair loss is a generally accepted male characteristic, drug-induced alopecia may be mistaken as part of a natural process and therefore under reported.

·        There have been reports of alopecia associated with the use of all UK licensed statins but there is insufficient data to confidently attribute hair loss to statin use.

·        Case studies suggest an association but as yet there is insufficient information to suggest a mechanism, make comparisons of the individual incidence of alopecia between the various statins or propose a class effect.

·        The greatest number of reports of alopecia is for simvastatin but this may be related to a greater market share or length of time on market.

It would seem that enough people lose hair from Verapamil for it to be a published side effect.  The same is not true for statins and I think hair loss may be coincidental.

But, maybe too much and too little Wnt signaling cause hair loss ?

Recall earlier in this post that Hans Otto Kalkman suggested that both too much and too little Wnt might cause similar behavioral and cognitive symptoms.  Perhaps the same is true with hair growth.

The canonical Wnt pathway plays a role in dendrite growth and suboptimal activity negatively affects the dendritic arbor. In principle, this provides a logical explanation as to why both hypo- and hyperactivity may generate a similar set of behavioral and cognitive symptoms.

For optimal hair growth perhaps there is an optimal amount of Wnt signaling? 

That might explain why a small number of people find Wnt inhibitors (Verapamil) and drugs that enhance Wnt (statins) cause hair loss.

That might mean that people with very full hair have optimal Wnt signaling?

So advise Homer Simpson to find out whether his Wnt signaling is hyper or hypo.  Then he might find either simvastatin or verapamil brings back his full head of hair.

Wnt signaling and Diabetes

Yet again we find another connection between Diabetes and autism.

In the pancreas  β-cells produce insulin. In diabetics these β-cells get destroyed.  It appears that Wnt signaling is involved in controlling these β-cells.  It has been proposed that they could be protected via this pathway.

Role of Wnt signaling in the development of type 2 diabetes.

 

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by insulin resistance, insulin deficiency, and hyperglycemia. Susceptibility to type 2 diabetes has been linked to Wnt signaling, which plays an important role in intestinal tumorigenesis. Carriers of variants of the transcription factor 7-like 2 gene, an important component of the Wnt pathway, are at enhanced risk for developing type 2 diabetes. The modulation of proglucagon expression by Wnt activity may partially explain the link between Wnt signaling and diabetes, and one of the transcriptional and processing products of the proglucagon gene, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), exhibits a wide variety of antidiabetogenic activities. GLP-1 stimulates Wnt signaling in pancreatic beta cells, enhancing cell proliferation; thus, positive feedback between GLP-1 and Wnt signaling may result in increased proliferation, and suppressed apoptosis, of pancreatic cells. Since beta-cell protection is a potential treatment for type 2 diabetes, stimulation of Wnt activity may represent a valid therapeutic approach.

Wnt signaling: relevance to β-cell biology and diabetes

Here, we review emerging new evidence that Wnt signaling influences endocrine pancreas development and modulates mature β-cell functions including insulin secretion, survival and proliferation. Alterations in Wnt signaling might also impact other metabolic tissues involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes, with TCF7L2 proposed to modulate adipogenesis and regulate GLP-1 production. Together, these studies point towards a role for Wnt signaling in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, highlighting the importance of further investigation of this pathway to develop new therapies for this disease.

Future Prospects of Wnt-Targeted Therapy for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

As with autism and cancer, the people with diabetes are also perhaps not benefiting from the latest science.

Preventing β-Cell Loss and Diabetes With Calcium Channel Blockers

Oral verapamil administration prevents β-cell apoptosis and STZ-induced diabetes.

The End.