UA-45667900-1
Showing posts with label Pitt Hopkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pitt Hopkins. Show all posts

Monday 11 December 2017

Cognitive Loss/Impaired Sensory Gating from HCN Channels - Recovered by PDE4 Inhibition or an α2A Receptor Agonist

Today we have a complex dysfunction, but we have a plausible understanding of the detailed biological underpinnings and several therapeutic options. It is relevant to people with autism who have impaired sensory gating (they find noises like a clock ticking annoying), and perhaps those who struggle with complex thought. It is very likely to be disturbed in some people with ADHD and many with schizophrenia.

Trouble in the Pre-Frontal Cortex


For a recap on sensory gating, here is an earlier post:-

Sensory Gating in Autism, Particularly Asperger's


Today’s dysfunction relates to HCN channels located on those tiny dendritic spines in a part of the brain called the pre-frontal cortex. These are a type of voltage gated potassium channel found in your brain and heart, there are 4 types, it looks to me that HCN2 is the key one today.
The pre-frontal cortex (PFC) is seen as the part of the brain most affected by mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar, ADHD etc.), although medicine’s current understanding looks rather medieval to me.
These HCN channels can open when they are exposed to cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate). When open, the information can no longer flow into the cell, and thus the network (created by numerous interacting neurons) is effectively disconnected.
By keeping these channels closed, it is thought that you can improve working memory and reducing distractibility. Now you might think distractibility is an odd word, and it is not a word I expected to encounter, what it really means is impaired sensory gating. This is a core feature of Asperger’s, ADHD and schizophrenia.
One of the key risk genes for schizophrenia, DISC1, also affects HCN channels and this may account for some of the cognitive deficit found in schizophrenia. High level thinking is particularly affected.  It is thought that loss of DISC1 function in the PFC would likely prevent proper PDE4 function, leading to a dysregulated build-up of cAMP in dendritic spines resulting in excessive opening of HCN channels


I did wonder how nicotine fits in, since in earlier post we saw that α7 nAChR agonists, like nicotine, improve sensory gating and indeed that people with schizophrenia tend to be smokers. It turns out that nicotine is also an HCN channel blocker. For a change, everything seems to fit nicely together. There are different ways to block HCN channels, some of which are indirect. One common ADHD drug, Guanfacine, keeps these channels closed, but in a surprising way.
Alpha-2A adrenergic receptors near the HCN channels, on those dendritic spines, inhibit the production of cAMP and the HCN channels stay closed, allowing the information to pass through into the cell, connecting the network. These Alpha-2A adrenergic  receptors are stimulated by a natural brain chemical norepinephrine, or by drugs like Guanfacine.
Stress appears to flood PFC neurons with cAMP, which opens HCN channels, temporarily disconnects networks, and impairs higher cognitive abilities.
This would explain why stress makes people’s sensory gating problems get worse. So someone with Asperger’s would get more distracted/disturbed at exam time at school for example, or when he goes for a job interview. Reducing stress is another method to improve sensory gating and indeed cognition. In Monty, aged 14 with ASD, the only time he exhibits significantly impaired sensory gating, is when he has stopped all his Polypill therapies for several days. I think stress/anxiety is what has changed and this opens those HCN channels. Then even the sound of someone eating food next to him makes him angry.
Excessive opening of HCN channels might underlie many lapses in higher cognitive function.
While the researchers at Yale patented the idea of HCN blockers to improve cognition, we can see how other existing ideas to improve cognition may indeed have the same mechanism, most notably PDE4 inhibitors.
The University of Maastricht holds patents on the use of Roflumilast, a PDE4 inhibitor, to improve cognition; most interestingly, this takes effect at one fifth of the COPD dosage, for which it is an approved drug. At high doses PDE4 inhibitors have annoying side effects, but at low doses they tend to be trouble-free.
One effect of a PDE4 inhibitor is that it reduces cAMP. So a PDE4 inhibitor acts indirectly like an HCN blocker.
Not surprisingly recent research showed that low doses of Roflumilast improves sensory gating in those affected by this issue.
So rather than waiting for a brain selective HCN blocker, the potential exists to use a one fifth dose of Roflumilast today. This is something that should indeed be investigated across different types of cognitive dysfunction.
There are numerous dysfunctions that can impair cognition and they can occur in different diagnosis. For example impaired autophagy is a key feature of Huntington’s, impaired remyelination defines multiple sclerosis, low levels of nerve growth factor are a key feature of Rett syndrome. Less severe dysfunctions of these processes occur in entirely different conditions.
It is thought that people with Alzheimer’s might benefit from PDE4 inhibition. If it was me, I would try it in all types of dementia or cognitive loss of any kind.

PDE4 Inhibitors
There have been many mentions of PDE4 inhibitors elsewhere in this blog. They are broadly anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant, but currently only widely used to treat asthma in Japan and COPD in Western countries. COPD is a kind of very severe asthma.
Traditionally a PDE4 inhibitor is thought of as drug used to block the degradative action of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) on cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). That all sound complicated, just think of it as increasing cAMP.
Now cAMP is a messenger in many biological processes, one of which relates to PKA (Protein Kinase A). In autism we know that PKA, PKB and PKC are often disturbed. These PKs are very important because they have the ability to literally change the function of thousands of proteins in your body. This is similar to how epigenetic tags can switch on or switch off a particular gene. PKs, via a different mechanism we will look at in another post, change the function of proteins, so it is very important that you have the correct level of PKA, PKB and PKC.
We saw in a recent post that the Pitt Hopkins gene TCF4 is regulated by PKA and that under-expression of TCF4 is also a feature of some ID and schizophrenia. So more PKA, please.

You can use a PDE4 inhibitor to increase cAMP, which then increases PKA.

Other effects of PDE4 inhibitors
Today’s post is about sensory gating and the effect here of PDE4 inhibitors is via the effect of cAMP on those HCN channels in your tiny dendritic spines.
There are numerous other effects of PDE4 that may also be therapeutic. One interesting effect is that inhibition of PDE4 can mimic calorie restriction by activating AMPK/SIRT1 pathway.
Calorie restriction has just been shown in a large trial to be able to reverse type 2 diabetes, if initiated with a few years of the disease developing.
Humans have evolved based to periods of feast and famine. Periods of fasting may be therapeutic for many modern conditions.
Not surprisingly one side effect of PDE4 inhibitors is weight loss. Many psychiatric drugs cause troubling weight gain.

Acute administration of Roflumilast enhances sensory gating in healthy young humans in a randomized trial. 

Abstract

 

INTRODUCTION:

Sensory gating is a process involved in early information processing which prevents overstimulation of higher cortical areas by filtering sensory information. Research has shown that the process of sensory gating is disrupted in patients suffering from clinical disorders including attention deficit hyper activity disorder, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors have received an increased interest as a tool to improve cognitive performance in both animals and man, including sensory gating.

METHODS:

The current study investigated the effects of the PDE4 inhibitor Roflumilast in a sensory gating paradigm in 20 healthy young human volunteers (age range 18-30 years). We applied a placebo-controlled randomized cross-over design and tested three doses (100, 300, 1000 μg).

RESULTS:

Results show that Roflumilast improves sensory gating in healthy young human volunteers only at the 100-μg dose. The effective dose of 100 μg is five times lower than the clinically approved dose for the treatment of acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). No side-effects, such as nausea and emesis, were observed at this dose. This means Roflumilast shows a beneficial effect on gating at a dose that had no adverse effects reported following single-dose administration in the present study.

CONCLUSION:

The PDE4 inhibitor Roflumilast has a favourable side-effect profile at a cognitively effective dose and could be considered as a treatment in disorders affected by disrupted sensory gating.


Background Information
Selective phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibition has been considered as a very promising target for cognition enhancement.
Roflumilast is a PDE4 inhibitor that has been developed by Takeda for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In recent year, Maastricht University has been collaborating with Takeda to develop Roflumilast for cognitive impairments
In 2015 Takeda sold COPD indication of Roflumilast to AstraZeneca, and ownership of IP for treatment of cognitive impairment returned to Maastricht University.
Compelling clinical results
A single administration of Roflumilast improves episodic memory in mice, and in young and elderly healthy subjects at a non-emetic dose
As shown in the figure, healthy (A) and memory impaired (B) elderly subjects showed better performances in the delayed recall of the Verbal Learning Task after roflumilast

Key Features and Advantages
Opportunities to reposition a clinically-proven safe compound with a well-established pharmacology.
Compelling preclinical and clinical evidences showing that Roflumilast effectively deliver to the brain to produce robust cognitive enhancement.
Pro-cognitive effects at low dose (5 times lower than COPD indication), which allows to circumvent the emetic effects commonly observed with other PDE4 inhibitors
Maastricht University has a strong IP protection extending to at least 2033.

PDE inhibitors in psychiatry--future options for dementia, depression and schizophrenia?

Author information

Abstract

Phosphodiesterases are key enzymes in cellular signalling pathways. They degrade cyclic nucleotides and their inhibition via specific inhibitors offers unique 'receptor-independent' opportunities to modify cellular function. An increasing number of in vitro and animal model studies point to innovative treatment options in neurology and psychiatry. This review critiques a selection of recent studies and developments with a focus on dementia/neuroprotection, depression and schizophrenia. Despite increased interest among the clinical neurosciences, there are still no approved PDE inhibitors for clinical use in neurology or psychiatry. Adverse effects are a major impediment for clinical approval. It is therefore necessary to search for more specific inhibitors at the level of different PDE sub-families and isoforms.


The current study found that brain cells in PFC contain ion channels called hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (HCN) that reside on dendritic spines, the tiny protrusions on neurons that are specialized for receiving information. These channels can open when they are exposed to cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate). When open, the information can no longer flow into the cell, and thus the network is effectively disconnected. Arnsten said inhibiting cAMP closes the channels and allows the network to reconnect.
Guanfacine can strengthen the connectivity of these networks by keeping these channels closed, thus improving working memory and reducing distractibility," she said. "This is the first time we have observed the mechanism of action of a psychotropic medication in such depth, at the level of ion channels."
Arnsten said the excessive opening of HCN channels might underlie many lapses in higher cognitive function. Stress, for example, appears to flood PFC neurons with cAMP, which opens HCN channels, temporarily disconnects networks, and impairs higher cognitive abilities.
The study also found alpha-2A adrenergic receptors near the channels that inhibit the production of cAMP and allow the information to pass through into the cell, connecting the network. These receptors are stimulated by a natural brain chemical  norepinephrine or by medications like guanfacine.
 “Guanfacine can strengthen the connectivity of these networks by keeping these channels closed, thus improving working memory and reducing distractibility,” she said. “This is the first time we have observed the mechanism of action of a psychotropic medication in such depth, at the level of ion channels.”
Yale has submitted a patent application on the use of HCN blockers for the treatment of PFC cognitive deficits based on the data reported in the Cell paper.

The full Yale paper:

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is among the most evolved brain regions, contributing to our highest order cognitive abilities. It regulates behavior, thought, and emotion using working memory. Many cognitive disorders involve impairments of the PFC. A century of discoveries at Yale Medical School has revealed the neurobiology of PFC cognitive functions, as well as the molecular needs of these circuits. This work has led to the identification of therapeutic targets to treat cognitive disorders. Recent research has found that the noradrenergic α2A agonist guanfacine can improve PFC function by strengthening PFC network connections via inhibition of cAMP-potassium channel signaling in postsynaptic spines. Guanfacine is now being used to treat a variety of PFC cognitive disorders, including Tourette’s Syndrome and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This article reviews the history of Yale discoveries on the neurobiology of PFC working memory function and the identification of guanfacine for treating cognitive disorders.

Molecular modeling suggests that, similarly to ZD 7288, nicotine and epibatidine directly bind to the inner pore of the HCN channels. It is therefore likely that nicotine severely influences rhythmogenesis and high cognitive functions in smokers.

Modulation of HCN channels in lateral septum by nicotine


Conclusion
I think many people stand to benefit from the drugs mentioned in today’s post, but for different biological reasons. A person with Pitt Hopkins may benefit from Roflumilast because it will upregulate PKA and then increase expression of their remaining TCF4 gene.
In a person with schizophrenia there are multiple reasons these drugs might help them and it will depend on which genes they have that are misexpressed (TCF4, DISC1 etc.).
In a person with idiopathic Asperger’s and impaired sensory gating it looks like the effect on HCN channels is what is important.
I think low dose Roflumilast has great potential for many. The Japanese drug Ibudilast very likely will provide similar benefits, but at what dosage?
PDE4 inhibitors do have side effects at higher doses in part because there are several different types of PDE4 (PDE4A, PDE4B, PDE4C etc) and different drugs effect different subtypes differently.
Ibudilast is used as a daily drug therapy for asthma in Japan and is being studied as a therapy for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in the US.
Roflumilast is sold by Astra Zeneca as Daxas/Daliresp but at a high dose of 500mcg to treat flare ups of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) it does cause troubling side effects, but it reduces your chance of dying from COPD.
The cognitive dose used in research is 100mcg. Higher doses had no cognitive/sensory gating benefit.
Further investigation of the ADHD drug Guanfacine should be made, because some of the people who benefit from a PDE4 inhibitor might get a similar effect from Guanfacine. People with Pitt Hopkins would not be in this category. A person with Asperger’s and impaired sensory dating should respond to Guanfacine, a cheap drug.
At the end of the day, choice of therapy will come down to side effects and cost. In the US, Roflumilast is expensive ($330), seven times more expensive than in some other countries; in the UK the price of the same 30 tablets is $50. One pack would be enough for 5 months at the suggested dose.




Thursday 23 November 2017

Under-expression (Haploinsufficiency) of ARID1B in Autism and Corpus Callosum Abnormalities


People keep telling me that my blog is too complicated; compared to the literature it really is not. If your child has a disabling condition you really should be willing to invest all the time needed to learn about it, rather than be a passive bystander.
I think you can investigate even complex sounding genetic disorders without being an expert, which is what happens in today’s post.  

Are there 20,000 types of jeans?

As readers may recall, humans only have about 20,000 genes, far less than originally was thought. Each gene provides the instructions to make one thing, usually a protein.
For the great majority of genes we have two copies, one from Mum and one from Dad. Mitochondrial genes all come from Mum.
These genes are stored on chromosomes (like recipe books).
For 22 of these recipe books you have two copies, so if one page got damaged at least you have an undamaged version from the other book.
The 23rd pair of books is special because while females have two copies, males do not. This is the X chromosome and if a male has a problem on any page in this little book, he has a big problem, while his sister has less of a problem, because she has a spare copy. The male has a Y chromosome in place of a second copy of X. 
Examples of problems on the X chromosome:-

·        The MECP2 gene is on the X chromosome and when there is one working copy and one mutated version you have Rett syndrome and you must be female. If you were male with one mutated version you cannot survive.

·        In Fragile X syndrome a problem with the FMR1 gene means not enough not enough fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which is required for normal development of the connection between neurons. Females would normally have a clean spare copy of the FMR1 gene and so show much less severe symptoms that a male with Fragile X.

Problems on chromosomes 1 to 22:-

If you have a problem in the first 22 chromosomes (recipe books), boys and girls are equal. If one page got damaged you can always look up the recipe in the other book.
In case one gene got mutated but the other copy is fine, things can work out just fine, in which case it is called haplosufficiency. You get to make enough of that protein.
In some cases you really need to use that recipe a lot; that particular protein is in big demand. One copy of that gene just is not enough. This is called  haploinsufficiency.
In most cases when the gene has a problem, it just fails to produce the intended protein. In some cases it actually produces a mutated protein, which can be worse than no protein. 

Pitt Hopkins

In Pitt Hopkins Syndrome there is a problem on chromosome 18, where you find the TCF4 gene. Not enough expression of TCF4 means not enough Transcription Factor 4;  this is an example of haploinsufficiency.
Now the reason why these rare conditions are important to many other people is that they not only affect people who happened to have a random mutation and hence a severe deficit of the protein; moderately reduced transcription of this gene, for any reason, can also result in troubling symptoms.
So in the case of the Pitt Hopkins and the gene TCF4, as was pointed out to me recently, reduced expression is a feature of some MR/ID and indeed schizophrenia. 


Instead of just a tiny number of people with Pitt Hopkins, you can see that upregulating TCF4 expression could help a lot of people.
It appears that people with Pitt Hopkins have a “clean copy” of TCF4, so it is just a case of making it work a little harder. There are ways being researched to achieve just that.
I suspect people with schizophrenia have two “clean copies” of TCF4, but for some reason have a deficiency of the protein encoded by it.
In the above paper it was shown that Protein Kinase A (PKA) plays a key role in regulating what your TCF4 gene is producing.
We have come across PKA before in this blog and we know that in regressive autism there can be a deficit of PKA. There is also PKB and PKC. All three are very important, but complicated. 


Without going into all the details you can see that if someone with Pitt Hopkins has a lack of PKA, like those with regressive autism, then he will struggle to make the most of his good copy of the gene TCF4.

It all gets very complicated, but PKA is controlled by something called cAMP. In turn cAMP is controlled by PDE. PDE4 is known to be disturbed in the brains of some people with autism.
It appears that you can activate PKA with a PDE4 inhibitor. The long established Japanese asthma drug Ibudilast is such a PDE4 inhibitor. At least one reader of this blog uses Ibudilast long term.


PDE4 inhibitors have been explored to treat various neurological conditions like schizophrenia.

So logically if you feed a PDE4 inhibitor to a Pitt Hopkins mouse, you might expect something good to happen. There now is such a mouse model.

I think I could keep that mouse quite busy. 
The point being you do not have to figure things out 100%, before starting to see what you have in your drug library might be truly beneficial.  
Some of the things in the drug library are actually in the kitchen cupboard, as we have already seen. 

Protein Kinase A
Protein kinase A (PKA) is something that is both complicated and important.
The effects of PKA activation vary with cell type.
PKA has always been considered important in formation of a memory.  Formation of a normal memory is highly sensitive to PKA levels; too much is bad and too little is bad.

ARID1B in Autism and Corpus Callosum Abnormalities
I don’t think anyone has set up a research foundation for agenesis of the Corpus Callosum (ACC), perhaps they should. 
There was a post on this a while back, prompted by meeting someone whose son has this condition. 

The Corpus Callosum is just a fancy name for what joins the two sides of the brain together. Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum (ACC) is what they call it when there is a complete or partial absence of the corpus callosum.

ACC is we are told a very rare condition, but clearly smaller corpus callosum variations are a key part of some autism. 
For example, in Pitt Hopkins a small corpus callosum is typical.
An estimated 7 percent of children with autism and macrocephaly (big heads) carry a PTEN mutation. This is associated with an enlarged corpus callosum. 
PTEN is an autism gene, but it is more usually thought of as a tumor suppressor, making it a cancer gene. In older people, losing PTEN appears to be often a first step to developing cancer; up to 70% of men with prostate cancer are estimated to have lost a copy of the PTEN gene at the time of diagnosis  (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16079851). 

PTEN is interesting because too little can allow cancer to develop, but too much may eventually result in type 2 diabetes. So, as always, it is a balance. 


Evidently from the comments in this blog, regarding tumors/cancers, people with autism are likely shifted towards the direction of lacking tumor suppressing proteins. The exception would be those born very small, or with small heads. 

ARID1B gene
ARID1B is another tumor suppressing gene, like PTEN, and like PTEN it is also an autism gene.
What I found interesting was the link between ARID1B and corpus callosum anomalies. 

ARID1B mutations are the major genetic cause of corpus callosum anomalies in patients with intellectual disability  



Corpus callosum abnormalities are common brain malformations with a wide clinical spectrum ranging from severe intellectual disability to normal cognitive function. The etiology is expected to be genetic in as much as 30–50% of the cases, but the underlying genetic cause remains unknown in the majority of cases.
Additional functional studies including a systematic search for ARID1B target genes may show how haploinsufficiency of ARID1B predispose to CC defects and to an array of cognitive defects, including severe speech defects

Several readers of this blog have highlighted a recent study:-  


We showed that cognitive and social deficits induced by an Arid1b mutation in mice are reversed by pharmacological treatment with a GABA receptor modulating drug. And, now we have a designer mouse that can be used for future studies." 

The full study:-


Clonazepam also reversed the reduced time spent in the center and reduced moving distance displayed by Arid1b-mutant mice in the open field test (Fig. 7c,d and Supplementary Fig. 14c). However, depression measures, using the forced swim test and the tail suspension test, showed no reversible effect of clonazepam in Arid1b+/− mice compared with controls (Fig. 7e,f). Our results show that clonazepam rescues impaired recognition, social memory, and elevated anxiety in Arid1b+/− mice. 
Our mouse model effectively mirrors the behavioral characteristics of intellectual disability and ASD. Arid1b+/− and Arid1bconditional-knockout mice displayed impaired spatial learning, recognition memory, and reference memory. Open field and social behavior tests also revealed decreased social interaction in the mice. Mice with mutations in genes encoding Smarca2 and Actl6b, other subunits of the BAF complex, have severe defects in social interaction and long-term memory35. Thus, this chromatin remodeling complex may provide a cellular and molecular platform for normal intellectual and social behavior. In addition, Arid1b+/− mice showed heightened levels of anxiety- and depression-related behaviors, which are common symptoms of ASD36. 
For people with intellectual disability, the prevalence of anxiety disorders has likewise been shown to be much higher. This may be due to reduced cognitive function and increased vulnerability to environmental demands. Communication difficulties may also make it more difficult for people with cognitive disabilities to deal with anxiety or fear. ARID1B haploinsufficiency may be responsible for multiple facets of characteristic ASD behaviors. Other isoforms of Arid1b that are not affected by the Arid1b mutation could exist in the mouse line. Additionally, it is possible that the genetic background for the mouse line may impact the effect of Arid1b haploinsufficiency. Thus it is important to consider allele specificity, genetic backgrounds, and knockout strategies for comparing phenotypes of other Arid1bhaploinsufficiency models.  
GABA allosteric modulators, including clonazepam, a benzodiazepine, have been used to treat seizures and anxiety. We found that clonazepam injection rescued deficits in object and social recognition and anxiety in Arid1b+/− mice. These results suggest that treatment with a benzodiazepine could be a potential pharmacological intervention for symptoms of ASD. Furthermore, our results suggest that pharmacological manipulation of GABA signaling is a potential treatment strategy for cognitive and social dysfunctions in ASD- or intellectual disability-associated disorders due to mutations in chromatin remodeling genes.  

ACC Research Foundation
If there actually was an ACC Research Foundation, they could explore whether clonazepam was therapeutic in children who have Arid1b haploinsufficiency.
While they are at it, they might want to look into Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy with agenesis of the corpus callosum (HMSN/ACC), this is caused by mutations in the potassium-chloride co-transporter 3 (SLC12A6/KCC3) gene. This I stumbled upon a long time ago, when trying to upregulate KCC2, which causes elevated intracellular chloride in many people with autism and likely many with Down Syndrome.

KCC2 is usually associated with neuropathic pain and now we see that so is KCC3. Odd reaction to pain is a well known feature of autism. The rather ill-defined condition of fibromyalgia seems common in female relatives of those with autism and I do not think this is just a coincidence. 
The interesting thing is that the research shows you can potentially upregulate KCC3 with curcumin. 

HMSN/ACC is a severe and progressive neurodegenerative disease that exhibits an early onset of symptoms. Signs of HMSN/ACC, such as hypotonia and delays in motor development skills, are noticed before 1 year of age. However, the motor abilities of patients progress slowly to 4–6 years of age, and these children are able to stand and walk with some help. This is followed by a motor deterioration that generally renders affected subjects wheelchair-dependent by adolescence. 
Accordingly, we found that curcumin relieved the ER retention of dimerized R207C in mammalian cultured cells. A diet enriched in curcumin may therefore be beneficial for the relief or delay of some of the HMSN/ACC symptoms in patients bearing the R207C mutation, including the Turkish patient described in this study (as patient has not yet reached puberty).

KCC3 defects also cause the very similar Andermann syndrome also known as agenesis of corpus callosum with neuronopathy (ACCPN).
KCC3 defects are associated with epilepsy.
My question was can you have KCC3 under-expression with partial ACC, epilepsy but no peripheral neuropathy? If this was likely, then upregulating KCC3 with curcumin might help.
The gene for KCC3 is located at chromosome 15q14. Based on my “logic of associations”, if you have ACC and epilepsy you should consider KCC3 under-expression.
I did suggest to my former classmate whose son has partial ACC and epilepsy, but no neuropathy, that it might be worth trying some curcumin. Since his son is already on anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) my suggested effect to look for was improved cognitive function.
6 months later it does indeed, apparently, improve cognitive function.  Of course this does not establish that upregulating KCC3 had anything to do with it. It is nonetheless a nice story and another parent has realized that you can change things for the better, in spite of what neurology currently says. 
The question now is can you have both ARID1B under-expression and KCC3 under-expression, in which case you would add some clonazepam, based on the latest research. At this point you should of course go and talk to your neurologist, rather than read my blog and that was my recommendation. 


We describe a patient who presented at our epilepsy-monitoring unit with myoclonic jerks, and was diagnosed with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). Imaging of his brain revealed partial agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC). We discuss the known genetic basis of both JME and ACC, as well as the role of the corpus callosum (CC) in primary generalized epilepsy. Both JME and ACC are associated with gene loci on chromosome 15q14. Structural brain abnormalities other than ACC, such as atrophy of the corpus callosum have been reported in patients with JME. ACC has been associated with seizures, suggesting an anti-epileptogenic role of the corpus callosum

Conclusion

If you have a biological diagnosis you are one big step closer to finding a therapy. Even if you have a diagnosis like partial Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum (ACC), you can go one step further and ask why. You have a 50% chance of being able to find out a specific gene that is the cause. If you know with certainty which gene is the originator of the problem, you know a lot.  I think you are then two big steps closer to a therapy.
In the case of Rett Syndrome, a really good website is run by their research foundation (Rett Syndrome Research Trust). They look like they mean business. 


If you look at the above site you might be left wondering why the much larger and better financed autism organizations look so amateur by comparison.  The big difference is that Rett Syndrome is a biological diagnosis and autism is not. In many ways calling autism a spectrum is not helpful, as the originators of the ASD concept are beginning to realize.  The precise biological dysfunctions are what matter and lumping together hundreds of miscellaneous brain dysfunctions into a pile labelled ASD may not be so clever, in fact I would call it primitive.









Monday 30 May 2016

Sense, Missense or Nonsense - Interpreting Genetic Research in Autism (TCF4, TSC2 , Shank3 and Wnt)




Some clever autism researchers pin their hopes on genetics, while some equally clever ones are not convinced.

One big problem is that genetic testing is still not very rigorous, it is fine if you know what you are looking for, like a specific single gene defect, but if it is a case of find any possible defect in any of the 700+ autism genes it can be hopeless.

Most of the single gene types of autism can be diagnosed based on known physical differences and then that specific gene can be analyzed to confirm the diagnosis.

Today’s post includes some recent examples from the research, and they highlight what is often lacking - some common sense.

There are numerous known single gene conditions that lead to a cascade of dysfunctions that can result in behaviors people associate with autism.  However in most of these single gene conditions, like Fragile X or Pitt-Hopkins, there is a wide spectrum, from mildly affected to severely affected.

There are various different ways in which a gene can be disturbed and so within a single gene condition there can be a variety of sub-dysfunctions.  A perfect example was recently forwarded to me, a study showing how a partial deletion of the Pitt Hopkins gene (TCF4) produced no physical features of the syndrome, but did unfortunately produce intellectual disability.

The study goes on to suggest that “screening for mutations in TCF4 could be considered in the investigation of NSID (non-syndromic intellectual disability)”

Partial deletion of TCF4 in three generation family with non-syndromic intellectual disability, without features of Pitt-Hopkins syndrome



This all matters because one day when therapies for Pitt Hopkins are available, they would very likely be effective on the cognitive impairment of those with undiagnosed partial-Pitt Hopkins.



Another reader sent me links to the studies showing:-


Rapamycin reverses impaired social interaction in mouse models of tuberous sclerosis complex.

Reversal of learning deficits in a Tsc2+/- mouse model of tuberous sclerosis.


But isn’t that Tuberous sclerosis (TSC) extremely rare? like Pitt Hopkins.  Is it really relevant?

Tuberous sclerosis (TSC)  is indeed a rare multisystem genetic disease that causes benign tumors to grow in the brain and on other vital organs such as the kidneys, heart, eyes, lungs, and skin. A combination of symptoms may include seizures, intellectual disability, developmental delay, behavioral problems, skin abnormalities, and lung and kidney disease. TSC is caused by a mutation of either of two genes, TSC1 and TSC2, 

About 60% of people with TSC have autism (biased to TSC2 mutations) and many have epilepsy.

How rare is TSC?  According to research between seven and 12 cases per 100,000, with more than half of these cases undetected.  

Call it 0.01%, rare indeed.

How rare is partial TSC?  What is partial TSC?  That is just my name for what happens when you have just a minor missense mutation, you have a mutation in TSC2 but have none of the characteristic traits of tuberous sclerosis, except autism.
In a recent study of children with autism 20% has a missense mutation of TSC2. 

Not so rare after all.


Mutations in tuberous sclerosis gene may be rife in autism


Mutations in TSC2, a gene typically associated with a syndrome called tuberous sclerosis, are found in many children with autism, suggests a genetic analysis presented yesterday at the 2016 International Meeting for Autism Research in Baltimore.
The findings support the theory that autism results from multiple ‘hits’ to the genome.
Tuberous sclerosis is characterized by benign tumors and skin growths called macules. Autism symptoms show up in about half of all people with tuberous sclerosis, perhaps due to abnormal wiring of neurons in the brain. Tuberous sclerosis is thought to result from mutations in either of two genes: TSC1 or TSC2.
The new analysis finds that mutations in TSC2 can also be silent, as far as symptoms of the syndrome go: Researchers found the missense mutations in 18 of 87 people with autism, none of whom have any of the characteristic traits of tuberous sclerosis.
“They had no macules, no seizure history,” says senior researcher Louisa Kalsner, assistant professor of pediatrics and neurology at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine in Farmington, who presented the results. “We were surprised.”
The researchers stumbled across the finding while searching for genetic variants that could account for signs of autism in children with no known cause of the condition. They performed genetic testing on blood samples from 87 children with autism.

Combined risk:

To see whether silent TSC2 mutations are equally prevalent in the general population, the researchers scanned data from 53,599 people in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database. They found the mutation in 10 percent of the individuals.
The researchers looked more closely at the children with autism, comparing the 18 children who have the mutation with the 69 who do not.
Children with TSC2 mutations were diagnosed about 10 months earlier than those without a mutation, suggesting the TSC2 mutations increase the severity of autism features. But in her small sample, Kalsner says, the groups show no differences in autism severity or cognitive skills. The researchers also found that 6 of the 18 children with TSC2 mutations are girls, compared with 12 of 69 children who don’t have the mutation.
TSC2 variants may combine with other genetic variants to increase the risk of autism. “We don’t think TSC is the sole cause of autism in these kids, but there’s a significant chance that it increases their risk,” Kalsner says.


"hyperactivation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a consequence of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) 1/2 inactivation."

"the combination of rapamycin and resveratrol may be an effective clinical strategy for treatment of diseases with mTORC1 hyperactivation."


So for the 20% of autism with partial TSC, so-called Rapalogs and other mTOR inhibitors could be helpful, but Rapalogs all have side effects.

One interesting option that arose in my earlier post on Type 3 diabetes and intranasal insulin is Metformin. The common drug used for type 2 diabetes.

 








Metformin regulates mTORC1 signaling (but so does insulin).

'Metformin activates AMPK by inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation, which in turn negatively regulates mTORC1 signaling via activation of TSC2 and inhibitory phosphorylation of raptor. In parallel, metformin inhibits mTORC1 signaling by suppressing the activity of the Rag GTPases and upregulating REDD1."

Source:  Rapalogs and mTOR inhibitors as anti-aging therapeutics



Clearly you could also just use intranasal insulin.  It might be less potent but should have less side effects because it acting only within the CNS (Metfornin would be given orally).



The Shank protein and the Wnt protein family

Mutations in a gene called Shank3 occur in about 0.5 percent of people with autism.  
But what about partial Shank3 dysfunction?

Shank proteins also play a role in synapse formation and dendritic spine maturation.

Mutations in this gene are associated with autism spectrum disorder. This gene is often missing in patients with 22q13.3 deletion syndrome

Researchers at MIT have just shown, for the first time, that loss of Shank3 affects a well-known set of proteins that comprise the Wnt signaling pathway.  Without Shank3, Wnt signaling is impaired and the synapses do not fully mature.


“The finding raises the possibility of treating autism with drugs that promote Wnt signaling, if the same connection is found in humans”

I have news for MIT, people already do use drugs that promote Wnt signaling, FRAX486 and Ivermectin for example.  All without any genetic testing, most likely.


Reactivating Shank3, or just promote Wnt signaling

The study below showed that in mice, aspects of autism were reversible by reactivating the Shank3 gene.  You might expect that in humans with a partial Shank3 dysfunction you might jump forward to the Wnt signaling pathway and intervene there.

Mouse study offers promise of reversing autism symptoms


One reader of this blog finds FRAX486 very helpful and to be without harmful side effects.  FRAX 486 was recently acquired by Roche and is sitting over there on a shelf gathering dust.



Where from here?

I think we should continue to look at the single gene syndromes but realize that very many more people may be partially affected by them.

Today’s genetic testing gives many false negatives, unless people know what they are looking for; so many dysfunctions go unnoticed.

This area of science is far from mature and there may be many things undetected in the 97% of the genome that is usually ignored that affect expression of the 3% that is the exome.

So best not to expect all the answers, just yet, from genetic testing; maybe in another 50 years.

Understanding and treating multiple-hit-autism, which is the majority of all autism, will require more detailed consideration of which signaling pathways have been disturbed by these hits.  There are 700 autism genes but there a far fewer signaling pathways, so it is not a gargantuan task.  For now a few people are figuring this out at home.   Good for them.

I hope someone does trials of metformin and intranasal insulin in autism.  Intranasal insulin looks very interesting and I was surprised to see in those earlier posts is apparently without side effects.

The odd thing is that metformin is indeed being trialed in autism, but not for its effect on autism, but its possible effect in countering the obesity caused by the usual psychiatric drugs widely prescribed in the US to people with autism.

My suggestion would be to ban the use of drugs like Risperdal, Abilify, Seroquel, Zyprexa etc.

Vanderbilt enrolling children with autism in medication-related weight gain study



Here are details of the trial.


Metformin will be dispensed in a liquid suspension of 100 mg/mL. For children 6-9 years of age, metformin will be started at 250 mg at their evening meal for 1 week, followed by the addition of a 250 mg dose at breakfast for 1 week. At the Week 2 visit, if metformin is well-tolerated, the dose will be increased to 500 mg twice daily. For children from 10-17 years of age, metformin will be started at 250 mg at their evening meal for 1 week, followed by the addition of a 250 mg dose at breakfast for 1 week. At the Week 2 visit, if metformin is well-tolerated, the dose will be increased to 500 mg twice daily. At the Week 4 visit, if metformin is well-tolerated, the dose will be increased to 850 mg twice daily.