UA-45667900-1
Showing posts with label Mirtazapine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mirtazapine. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 March 2016

Cardiazol, a failed Schizophrenia treatment from the 1930s, repurposed at low doses as a Cognitive Enhancer in Down Syndrome and likely some Autism




Italy has many attractions, one being Lake Como (Villa Clooney). 
It is also the only western country still using Cardiazol, where it is used in a cough medicine



Varanasi and the Ganges, not a place you could forget, particularly the smell.
India is the only other country using Cardiazol


Today’s post draws on clever things going on in Down Syndrome research to improve cognitive function, but puts them in the perspective of the faulty GABA switch. 

In the United States it is estimated that 250,000 families are affected by Down Syndrome.  It is caused by a third copy of chromosome 21, resulting in up-regulation of around 300 genes.  A key feature is low IQ, this is partly caused by a physically smaller cerebellum and it appears partly by the GABA switch.  Research has shown that the cerebellum growth could be normalized, but this post is all about the GABA switch. 

In an earlier very science heavy post we saw how a faulty GABA switch would degrade cognitive function in many people with autism, schizophrenia or Down Syndrome. Basmisanil is a drug in Roche’s development pipeline.

The GABA Switch, Altered GABAa Receptor subunit expression in Autism and Basmisanil


   
More evidence to show the GABA switch affects schizophrenia was provided by our reader Natasa.




Perturbations of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission in the human prefrontal cortex have been implicated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia (SCZ), but the mechanisms are unclear. NKCC1 (SLC12A2) is a Cl--importing cation-Cl- cotransporter that contributes to the maintenance of depolarizing GABA activity in immature neurons, and variation in SLC12A2 has been shown to increase the risk for schizophrenia via alterations of NKCC1 mRNA expression. However, no disease-causing mutations or functional variants in NKCC1 have been identified in human patients with SCZ. Here, by sequencing three large French-Canadian (FC) patient cohorts of SCZ, autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and intellectual disability (ID), we identified a novel heterozygous NKCC1 missense variant (p.Y199C) in SCZ. This variant is located in an evolutionarily conserved residue in the critical N-terminal regulatory domain and exhibits high predicted pathogenicity. No NKCC1 variants were detected in ASD or ID, and no KCC3 variants were identified in any of the three neurodevelopmental disorder cohorts. Functional experiments show Y199C is a gain-of-function variant, increasing Cl--dependent and bumetanide-sensitive NKCC1 activity even in conditions in which the transporter is normally functionally silent (hypotonicity). These data are the first to describe a functional missense variant in SLC12A2 in human SCZ, and suggest that genetically encoded dysregulation of NKCC1 may be a risk factor for, or contribute to the pathogenesis of, human SCZ.


This study showed that some with schizophrenia will likely benefit from Bumetanide, but that the underlying reason for excessive NKCC1 activity in schizophrenia is not the same as in ASD.  Different cause but the same end result and the same likely therapy, repurposing an old existing drug.


α3 and α5 sub-units of GABAA

The science is rather patchy, but it seems that the α3 sub-unit of GABAA receptors is under-expressed in some autism and there is a fair chance that the α5 sub-unit is correspondingly over-expressed.

We know that over-expression of α5 is associated with cognitive impairment.

Down regulating α5 is currently a hot topic in Down Syndrome and at least two drugs are in development.

Reading the Down Syndrome research suggests that those involved have not really understood what is going on.  They do seek to modify GABA signaling, but have not realized that likely problem is the miss-expression of GABAA subunits in the first place, exactly as in autism.  As in autism, this faulty “GABA switch” has more than one dimension.  An incremental benefit can be expected from correcting each one.


Further support for the use of low dose Clonazepam in some Autism


In previous posts we saw how Professor Catterall's idea to use low dose clonazepam to treat some autism does translate from mice to humans.  This was based on up-regulating the α3 sub-unit of GABAA receptors.

There is some new research on this subject and Japanese research is very often of the highest quality.

In the paper below, highlighted by our reader Tyler, they use low dose clonazepam to reduce autistic behavior in a rare condition called Jacobsen syndrome.  While Professor Catterall and several readers of this blog are using low dose clonazepam to upregulate the α3 sub unit of GABAA receptors, the Japanese attribute the benefit to the γ2 subunit.


Whichever way you look at it, another reason to support trial of low dose clonazepam in autism.  When I say low, I mean a dose 100 to 1,000 times lower than the standard doses.


PX-RICS-deficient mice mimic autism spectrum disorder in Jacobsen syndrome through impaired GABAA receptor trafficking 

Jacobsen syndrome (JBS) is a rare congenital disorder caused by a terminal deletion of the long arm of chromosome 11. A subset of patients exhibit social behavioural problems that meet the diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD); however, the underlying molecular pathogenesis remains poorly understood.

ASD-like behavioural abnormalities in PX-RICS-deficient mice are ameliorated by enhancing inhibitory synaptic transmission with a GABAAR agonist (Clonazepam)
   
A curative effect of clonazepam on autistic-like behaviour

 These results demonstrate that ASD-like behaviour in PX-RICS−/− mice is caused by impaired postsynaptic GABA signalling and that GABAAR agonists have the potential to treat ASD-like behaviour in JBS patients and possibly non-syndromic ASD individuals.




“Correcting GABA” in Down Syndrome

I expect there may be four different methods, all relating to GABAA, to improve cognition in Down Syndrome just as there appear to be in autism:-

·        Reduce intracellular Cl- by blocking NKCC1 with bumetanide
 ·        Down regulate α5 sub-units of GABAA
 ·        Damp down GABAA receptors with an antagonist
 ·        Upregulate α3 sub-units of GABAA

Two of the above are being pursued in Down Syndrome research, but two do not seem to be.



Enhancing Cognitive Function in Down Syndrome

These are the sort of headlines that appeal to me:-



Cognitive-enhancing drugs may have a significant impact, doctors say. An IQ boost of just 10 to 15 points could greatly increase the chance that someone with the syndrome would be able to live independently as an adult, said Brian Skotko, co-director of the Down syndrome program at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, who has a sister with the condition.

In 2004, Stanford University neurobiologist Craig Garner and a student of his at the time, Fabian Fernandez, realized scientists might be able to counteract the Down Syndrome with drugs…
Researchers did a test in mice using an old GABA-blocking drug called PTZ. After 17 days, the treatment normalized the rodents’ performance on mazes and certain object recognition and memory tasks for as long as two months, according to results published in 2007 in Nature Neuroscience….

“It was bloody amazing,” Garner said by telephone. “It was shocking how well it worked.”

  


In their work, Hernandez, who is at Roche AG, and colleagues both at Roche and in academia chronically treated mice that have an animal version of Down syndrome with RO4938581, a drug that targets GABA receptors containing an alpha5 subunit. GABA is the major inhibitory transmitter in the brain, and in Down syndrome, there appears to be too much inhibitory signaling in the hippocampus – where, it so happens, GABA receptors with the alpha5 subunit are concentrated.

Treatment with RO4938581 improved the animals' memory abilities in a maze, decreased hyperactivity and reversed their long-term potentiation deficit. In the hippocampus, which is an important brain structure for memory and cognition, it also increased the birth rate of neurons back to the levels seen in normal animals, and led to a decrease in the number of inhibitory connections between cells.


  
In short there are two methods being developed, both potentially applicable to some autism:-


METHOD 1.   Dampen GABAA receptors with an antagonist

METHOD 2.   Dampen GABA with an inverse agonist of α5 sub-unit  



Initially it was thought method 1 could not be used because of the risk of seizure/epilepsy.


“these drugs (GABAA antagonists) are convulsant at high doses, precluding their use as cognition enhancers in humans, particularly considering that DS patients are more prone to convulsions”


From:-

Specific targeting of the GABA-A receptor α5 subtype by a selective inverse agonist restores cognitive deficits in Down syndrome mice


  
However this seems to have been overly conservative.

In the 2007 Stanford study they make a big point of their dosing being far lower than that used to induce seizures.

While you may need for a decade to get hold of Basmisanil (method 2), Cardiazol/PZT (method 1) is available in some pharmacies today.  The only complication is that it is in a cough medicine that also contains Dihydrocodeine.

In some countries Dihydrocodeine is used in OTC painkillers along with paracetamol or ibuprofen, while in other countries it is a banned substance.

In Italy and India Cardiazol, with Dihydrocodeine, is given to toddlers as a cough medicine.


  

METHOD 1.   Dampen GABAA receptors with an antagonist
  
As seems to be the case quite often, you can sometimes repurpose an old drug rather than spend decades developing a new one.  This is the case with Cardiazol/ Pentylenetetrazol that was used in the Stanford trial.


Confusing Medical Jargon, (again)

Cardiazol, the name an elderly psychiatrist would recognize, is also called:-

·        Pentylenetetrazol
·        Pentylenetetrazole
·        Metrazol
·        Pentetrazol
·        Pentamethylenetetrazol
·        PTZ
·        BTD-001 
·        DS-102

Other than to confuse us, why do they need so many names for the same drug?


Cardiazol/ Pentylenetetrazol is a drug that was widely used in the 1930s in Mental Hospitals to trigger seizures that were supposed to treat people with Schizophrenia.  At much lower doses, it found a new purpose decades ago as an ingredient in cough medicine.

Electroconvulsive therapy later took the place of Cardiazol, as psychiatrists sought to treat people by terrifying them.  It was later concluded that the only benefit in giving people Cardiazol was the fear associated with it. Electroconvulsive therapy is still used today in autism.

  
For a background into Cardiazol as a schizophrenia therapy, the following is not very pleasant reading:-
  

  
The 2007 Stanford trial of Cardiazol (there called PTZ) also trialed another GABAA antagonist called picrotoxin (PTX).  Picrotoxin is, not surprisingly, a toxin, it is therefore a research drug but it has been given to horses to make them run faster.


  
Recent neuroanatomical and electrophysiological findings from a
mouse model of Down syndrome (DS), Ts65Dn, suggest that there is
excessive inhibition in the dentate gyrus, a brain region important for
learning and memory. This circuit abnormality is predicted to compromise normal mechanisms of synaptic plasticity, and perhaps mnemonic processing. Here, we show that chronic systemic administration of noncompetitive GABAA antagonists, at non – epileptic doses, leads to a persistent, post drug, recovery of cognition in Ts65Dn mice, as well as recovery of deficits in long – term potentiation (LTP). These data suggest that excessive GABAergic inhibition of specific brain circuits is a potential cause of mental retardation in DS, and that GABAA antagonists may be useful therapeutic tools to facilitate functional changes that can ameliorate cognitive impairment in children and young adults with the disorder.


One important things is that this cognitive enhancing effect persisted for a couple of months.

As you will see in the human clinical trial at the end of this post, they are comparing single doses with daily doses to understand the pharmokinetics.

The lead author, Craig Garner went on to start his own company because nobody seemed interested in his findings.


“Balance is now testing a GABA-blocking drug, BTD-001, on 90 adolescents and adults with Down syndrome in Australia, with results expected by early next year, said Lien, chief executive officer of the company.”



GABAA agonists and antagonists

The jargon does get confusing, if you want to stimulate GABAA receptors, you would use an agonist like GABA itself, or something that mimics it.

If you want to damp down the effect of GABAA receptors you would need an antagonist.

So if GABAA receptors are “malfunctioning”, you could either fix the malfunction or turn them down to reduce their effect.

If you cannot entirely repair the malfunction you could always do both.  The overall effect might be better, or might not be, and it might well vary from person to person depending on the degree and nature of malfunction.

We saw in a previous post the idea of using drugs like bumetanide, diamox, and potassium bromide to restore E/I balance and then give GABA a little boost with a GABA agonist like Picamillon.  This is very easy to test.  In our case that little boost, did not help.

In those people who do not respond well, we can take the idea developed by Stanford for Down Syndrome and do the opposite, use a tiny amount of an antagonist, to see if that fine tuning has any beneficial effect.  We now see this is both simple and safe.



METHOD 2.   Inverse agonists of α5 sub-unit GABAA

I do like method 2, but would prefer not to wait another decade.

Method 2 sets out to improve cognitive function by dampening the activity of α5 sub-unit GABAA.

The Downs Syndrome researchers at Roche are developing Basmisanil/RG-1662 for this purpose.  It will be a long while till it appears on the shelf of your local pharmacy.

I did look to see if there any clever ways to down regulate the α5 sub-unit of GABAA , other than those drugs being developed for Down Syndrome. 

Inverse agonists of of α5 sub-unit GABAA



The only option today would be the Pyridazines, which include cefozopran (a 4th generation antibiotic), cadralazine (reduces blood pressure), minaprine (withdrawn antidepressant), pipofezine (a Russian a tricyclic antidepressant), hydralazine (reduces blood pressure, but has problems), and cilazapril (ACE inhibitor).

Pipofezine looks interesting.

Now we can compare Pipofezine with Mirtazapine.   They are both this tricyclic antidepressants, so both closely related to H1 antihistamine drugs.  We saw in earlier posts that Mirtazapine helps some people with autism in quite unexpected ways.



  


To be classed as a Pyridazines there has to be the benzene ring with two adjacent nitrogen atoms












So mirtazapine is not quite a Pyridazine, so may not directly affect the α5 sub-unit; but it does have potent effects elsewhere on the same receptor.  It is will increase the concentration of neuroactive steroids that act as positive allosteric modulators via the steroid binding site on GABAA receptors.
  
We saw this in earlier posts that changes in progesterone levels affect not only the function of GABAA but even the subunit composition and hence indirectly possibly α5 sub-unit expression.

I previously suggested both progesterone and pregnenalone as potential autism therapies.  Pregnenalone has since been trialed at Stanford.

The problem with these substances is that they are also female hormones and giving them in high doses to young boys is not a good idea.  Stanford used adults in their trial.

However, affecting the metabolites of progesterone rather than increasing the amount of progesterone itself may give the good, without the bad.  Also, perhaps there is a reason, oxidative stress perhaps, why progesterone metabolism might be disturbed in autism?

Anyway, it is yet another plausible reason why mirtazapine helps some people with autism.


Influence of mirtazapine on plasma concentrations of neuroactive steroids in major depression and on 3alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity


Certain 3alpha-reduced metabolites of progesterone such as 3alpha,5alpha-tetrahydroprogesterone (3alpha,5alpha-THP, 5alpha-pregnan-3alpha-ol-20-one, allopregnanolone) and 3alpha,5beta-tetrahydroprogesterone (3alpha,5beta-THP, 5beta-pregnan-3alpha-ol-20-one, pregnanolone) are potent positive allosteric modulators of the italic gamma-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptor complex.123

 Mirtazapine affects neuroactive steroid composition similarly as do SSRIs. The inhibition of the oxidative pathway catalyzed by the microsomal 3alpha-HSD is compatible with an enhanced formation of 3alpha-reduced neuroactive steroids. However, the changes in neuroactive steroid concentrations more likely reflect direct pharmacological effects of this antidepressant rather than clinical improvement in general.



So there may indeed be an effect on α5 sub-unit GABAA, but there is also an effect on another α5 subunit, this time the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR).  Those I looked at in earlier posts.  This is getting rather off-topic.

The gene that encode the α5 sub-unit of nAChR is called CHRNA5.  It is associated with nicotine dependence (and hence lung cancer), but is also linked to anxiety.  GABA sub-units expression also plays a key role in anxiety.  So a reason Mirtazapine should help reduce anxiety.

  

Progesterone modulation ofα5 nAChR subunits influences anxiety-related behavior during estrus cycle 


 It has already been shown that GABAA receptor subunit expression and composition is modulated by progesterone both in vitro and in vivo(Biggio et al. 2001Griffiths & Lovick 2005Lovick 2006Pierson et al. 2005Weiland & Orchinik 1995) but this is the first report showing an effect of physiological concentrations of progesterone on nAChR subunit expression levels.




Pharmokinetics of Cardiazol


Since mouse experiments indicated an effect that continues after stopping using the drug, the clinical trials are particularly looking at the so called pharmokinetics.  What is best a small daily dose or occasional larger doses?

You would hope they will be keeping a watchful eye on seizures.

I do not know what doses was used in those mental hospitals in the 1930s, but it must be well documented somewhere.





Experimental doses in adults vary widely from a “one off” 100mg to a daily dose of 2000mg. Look how they treat the 7 cohorts in the trial.

The cough medicine has 100mg of Cardiazol per 1ml

The usual dose is one drop per year of age, so a 12 year old would have a 0.6ml  dose containing 60mg of Cardiazol.  That is dosage is give 2 to 4 times a day, so up to 240mg a day

This dose is well up there with the dosage used in the above clinical trial, which starts at a one off dose of just 100mg or daily doses of 500mg in adults.

The above trial has been completed but the results have not been published.

If the trial is positive at the lower dose range, the cough medicine is a very cheap alternative.




Conclusion

I wish a safe inverse agonist of the α5 sub-unit of GABAA existed for use today.

I do not know anyone with Down Syndrome and this blog does not have many readers from Italy.  The standard pediatric dose of Cardiazol Paracodina  cough medicine might be well worth a try for both those with Down Syndrome and some autism with cognitive dysfunction. 

We actual have quite a few readers from India and that is the only other country using this drug.  In India the producer is Nicholas Piramal and the brand name is Cardiazol Dicodid, it cost 30 US cents for 10ml.  So for less than $1, or 70 rupees, you might have a few months of cognitive enhancement, that is less than some people pay for 1 minute of ABA therapy.

If a few drops of this children’s cough medicine improves cognition please lets us all know.









Wednesday, 10 February 2016

More Failed Autism Trials and (28 million) thoughts as to why



Two autism therapies mentioned in this blog have recently failed in their clinical trials.

The selective mGluR5 antagonist mavoglurant failed in two trials funded by Roche and Coronado Biosciences threw in the towel with its Trichuris suis ova (“TSO”) program.  TSO are parasites that are introduced to the gut to modify the immune response, they are thought to help conditions like ulcerative colitis and some autism.



"Coronado Biosciences (NASDAQ: CNDO) has decided to no longer pursue the development of its Trichuris suis ova (“TSO”) program. The Company is terminating all on-going TSO trials, including the Company’s Phase 2A clinical trial of TSO in pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder. A preliminary analysis of data from this trial failed to demonstrate any signal of activity."


The original user of TSO in autism documented his case here:-

http://autismtso.com/

It has been a long time since the father updated his site. Does he still give TSO to his son?

This adds to a growing list of very expensive failures.

The good news is that people are beginning to wonder why these, and all the previous trials, "failed".  Perhaps some were not failures, rather narrowly selective successes.  A new initiative is underway called Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials to try to develop more objective measures both for diagnosing autism in young children and for tracking changes.


"The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT) is a multicenter research study based at Yale that spans Duke University, Boston Children’s Hospital, the University of Washington/Seattle Children’s Research Institute and the University of California, Los Angeles. The aim of the consortium is to develop reliable and objective measurements of social function and communication in people with autism."
  

NIH provides $28M to study autism biomarkers via its Biomarkers Consortium


That is a lot of money.



I wish them well.

I do not think they fully realize the task facing them.  There are hundreds of “autisms” and many are dynamic, so changing over time.  Even if you find a responder to a therapy, if you tested the same person six months later he might not respond positively. 

It is highly unlikely that any single therapy can target all the symptoms in any case of autism.  So multiple therapies will be needed.

For many people, autism is a moving target, any kind of allergy, tooth issue or other inflammation could cause a false negative.



Single Gene vs Idiopathic Autism

It should be much easier to develop treatment for single gene autisms, like Fragile X, than for the idiopathic (“we have no clue what causes it”) autisms.  The above trials by Roche were in Fragile-X, where at least you know that all the subjects in the trial started with the same single gene dysfunction. 

But do they have other genetic/epigenetic dysfunctions?  Do they all have the same downstream dysfunctions? 

Fragile X is caused by a lack of the FRMP protein, perhaps the only time to correct this is very early in life.  Thereafter you have the downstream consequences, some of which overlap with ideopathic autism, some of these may well be treatable. 


 Autism Case Reports and Anecdotal Evidence

A good source of information remains published case reports.  These are documented pieces of anecdotal evidence showing what appeared to help a particular person. Here is one highlighted recently by Agnieszka, a reader of this blog.

Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as A Possible Novel Therapy for Managing Epilepsy and Autism, A Case Report and Review of Literature



The index patient is a 9 year old boy with autism spectrum disorder diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). He suffered from generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy from age 4. He had taken multiple different medications such as phenobarbital, sodium valporate, and carbamazepine with sufficient dosages and durations without favorable control of his epilepsy. According to his parents’ reports, the patient took cefixime 200mg/day to control diarrhea about 2 years ago. The seizure episodes were dramatically decreased 3 days after starting the medication while the there was no change in his anti-epileptic medication regime. The seizure episodes were controlled for about 5 months, after which the number of seizure episodes again increased. His highly educated parents administered cefixime 200mg/day to control seizure again. They reported that seizure attacks were controlled markedly after taking cefixime for three days. The patient was not febrile while the medication trials were administered. Both parents reported that they repeated this trial for several times to control the seizure episodes in the recent years. The epilepsy was controlled in all of the trials after taking cefixime for 3 to 5 days. Then, they discontinued cefixime after 7 days. They reported that there was a marked decreased in the number of seizure attacks as well as aggressive behaviors.


You cannot read too much into any one case report, other than to note how many totally unrelated interventions seem to benefit unique cases of autism.  This only goes to show that totally unrelated dysfunctions can manifest themselves as “autism”.

If you grouped all the anecdotal evidence together you would have some interesting reading.  If someone actually followed up on these anecdotes and did some additional investigation on each case we might learn very much more.



Previous Autism Clinical Trials

When I read the original clinical trials of NAC and Bumetanide in Autism, the results seemed good enough to me to warrant my own trial.

I do not see why there has not yet been a follow up of Stanford’s trial of NAC.  There was a patent (below) and then nothing.  It clearly works in many people, but most clinicians will not prescribe it until it is “evidence based”.  Those granted the patent should then go and collect some more evidence.



Bumetanide has also been patented for autism and the next stage of trials will follow, we are informed.

I will be interested to see whether the phase 3 trials are solid enough to convince mainstream clinicians to actually prescribe it.  "A diuretic for autism, come on, be serious!"

Nothing would surprise me.


Funding for Future Trials

It would be a bold person who invested any profit-seeking capital in autism trials, but they keep coming forward.  Here is another new one, OV101 from start-up Ovid.

The only reliable source is public money and philanthropy.

It looks like the US NIH (National Institutes of Health) still has deep pockets and Jim Simons keeps backing his Foundation.



mGLuR5

Roche may not have succeeded with their mGLuR5 drug, mavoglurant, but mGluR5 remains a target for treating schizophrenia and autism



Receptors in brain linked to schizophrenia, autism



Disruption of mGluR5 in parvalbumin-positive interneurons induces corefeatures of neurodevelopmental disorders





What would a successful Autism Trial look like?

Given the heterogeneous nature of autism, even a really effective drug might not look so good in the data.  Very specific drugs that counter the disorders where there can be both hypo and hyper, will come out with some good responders, some with no effect and a sizable number with a bad effect; so on average not so good.

Drugs that affect the most common down stream effect, oxidative stress, would come out best.  So I the results Hardan obtained in his Stanford trial of NAC will be as good as it gets.  Those results were enough for me, but not so impressive to many.

Now reconsider a long forgotten trial of an anti-depressant drug, developed from a first generation antihistamine.

This trial has a rather eclectic mix of 26 subjects, but 36% were responders, either much improved or very much improved in a wide variety of symptoms including aggression, self-injury, irritability, hyperactivity, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. However the authors judge the trial drug as: 


  "Mirtazapine was well tolerated but showed only modest effectiveness for treating the associated symptoms of autistic disorder" 


What were they hoping for ?






Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to conduct a naturalistic, open-label examination of the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine (a medication with both serotonergic and noradrenergic properties) in the treatment of associated symptoms of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs).
METHODS:

Twenty-six subjects (5 females, 21 males; ages 3.8 to 23.5 years; mean age 10.1 +/- 4.8 years) with PDDs (20 with autistic disorder, 1 with Asperger's disorder, 1 with Rett's disorder, and 4 with PDDs not otherwise specified were treated with open-label mirtazapine (dose range, 7.5-45 mg daily; mean 30.3 +/- 12.6 mg daily). Twenty had comorbid mental retardation, and 17 were taking concomitant psychotropic medications. At endpoint, subjects' primary caregivers were interviewed using the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, and a side-effect checklist.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five of 26 subjects completed at least 4 weeks of treatment (mean 150 +/- 103 days). Nine of 26 subjects (34.6%) were judged responders ("much improved" or "very much improved" on the CGI) based on improvement in a variety of symptoms including aggression, self-injury, irritability, hyperactivity, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Mirtazapine did not improve core symptoms of social or communication impairment. Adverse effects were minimal and included increased appetite, irritability, and transient sedation.

CONCLUSIONS:


Mirtazapine was well tolerated but showed only modest effectiveness for treating the associated symptoms of autistic disorder and other PDDs.



I think that was a successful trial that should have been followed up, rather then being forgotten.